Independent equity research · European markets

Reading the numbers behind the headlines.

Earnings notes, balance-sheet teardowns, and guidance reviews from someone who spent two decades trading them.

Julien Laroche

Former Head of European Equities Trading · Now an independent observer of corporate fundamentals.

I spent close to twenty years on European equities trading desks in Paris and London, the last seven as desk lead with responsibility for cash and program flows across DAX, CAC and Euro Stoxx names. My day job was matching liquidity to risk; my obsession, always, was the gap between what management said on the call and what the filings actually showed.

I left the sell side in 2024 to write full-time. Financial Statement Analysis is a place to publish the kind of close reading I used to share informally with clients: short, opinionated notes built from the cash flow statement up. No price targets, no model marketing — just an attempt to take the financials seriously.

  • Coverage European large & mid caps
  • Focus Cash conversion, working-capital quality, guidance credibility
  • Cadence One long note per week, plus quick takes on results day

Recent analysis

LVMH Q1 2026: the volume problem the price mix can no longer hide

Group organic revenue printed +1% against a Bloomberg consensus of +2.4%, and once again Fashion & Leather Goods carried the entire show. But the more interesting line is further down the cash flow statement.

The headline beat-vs-miss debate misses what the working capital movement is telling us. Inventories rose €1.1bn quarter-on-quarter while reported sell-out softened in Greater China and the United States. That is not a deliberate stock build — management would have flagged it — it is a sell-through problem accumulating on wholesale balance sheets, and it will eventually have to be cleared either through markdowns or through tighter shipments into Q3.

Operating margin held at 26.4%, only 80bps below the prior year, which on the face of it looks like impressive cost discipline. The footnote tells a different story: marketing & communication spend was rebased lower by roughly €240m year-on-year. In a brand business, that is a borrowed margin, not an earned one. Selling side the buy-back of €600m completed in the quarter flatters EPS by a touch under one percent — not material, but worth noting when the sell side starts pointing to "EPS resilience".

"When a luxury house starts talking about ‘normalisation’ in three consecutive quarters, it has stopped being normalisation and started being the new run rate."

The line I want to flag for readers who will not have time to dig through the URD: free cash flow from operations after lease payments converted at only 58% of net income, against a five-year average closer to 82%. Capex into retail networks remains elevated, and Tiffany & Co. is still a cash-absorbing asset two years past the optimistic synergy schedule. This is not a broken thesis, but the equity has been priced as a bond with growth optionality, and the optionality is the part that just got marked down.

ASML Q1 2026: the order book finally re-accelerates — but mind the geographic mix

Net bookings of €5.6bn beat the highest published estimate by some distance, and EUV took roughly 70% of the haul. Veldhoven exhaled. So did the sector. I'd hold the celebration to one drink.

Two things deserve a closer look before extrapolating. First, the geographic breakdown: China shipments dropped to 19% of system revenue from a peak above 45% two years ago, and the gap has been filled almost entirely by a single Korean memory customer pulling forward High-NA capacity. Customer concentration in the EUV book is now more pronounced than at any point since 2019. That is a vulnerability, not just a tailwind.

Second, gross margin guidance for Q2 of 51–52% is being read as conservative, but the mix mechanics explain most of it: the High-NA systems being recognised carry materially lower initial margins until the install base scales. The real margin question is not whether 2026 prints in line — it will — but whether the 56–58% long-term band still holds once High-NA is a third of revenue rather than a rounding error.

Service revenue of €1.6bn, up 11% y/y, is the quietly important number. The installed base is now generating recurring economics that look much more like a software company than the sell side gives credit for. That is the part of the story that, in my view, justifies the multiple, far more than any one quarter of bookings.

BNP Paribas Q1 2026: NII rolls over, and the cost of risk is doing the heavy lifting

Group revenue of €12.4bn was a 1% beat, but the composition is not the one bulls were hoping for. Net interest income at the Commercial & Personal Banking division contracted 4.2% year-on-year as the deposit beta caught up.

The peak-NII debate in European banking is over — this print settles it. Eurozone deposit repricing is no longer a tailwind, and the structural hedge contribution that flatters several UK names does not exist in the same form here. Fee income at Global Banking partly offset the drag (Equity & Prime Services had a strong quarter, +14% y/y), but fee businesses are not what the equity story has been priced on for the last eighteen months.

Cost of risk came in at 28bps, well below the through-the-cycle guidance of 40bps. Provisions on Stage 1 and 2 exposures were released net — never a number to celebrate, in my experience — and the headline EPS beat depends almost entirely on this line. Strip cost of risk back to guidance and the print is a 4% miss.

"Provisions are an opinion. Net interest income is a fact. Read the press release in that order."

CET1 of 13.1% gives plenty of room for the announced €1.05bn buyback to complete without stressing the capital plan, and management's reiteration of the >12% RoTE ambition for 2027 is at least directionally credible. But the path to that number now requires either a steeper curve than the market is pricing or a meaningful pickup in Corporate & Institutional Banking. Neither is in the bag.

TotalEnergies Q1 2026: the integrated model is doing exactly what it was designed to do

Adjusted net income of $4.9bn was a clean in-line print, but the integrated power segment turned a $180m operating profit for the first time. Small number, important signal.

For four years the bear case on the European majors has been that renewables capex destroys returns and the integrated transition is a slow-motion impairment cycle. This quarter is the first one I would point to as a counter-data-point that doesn't require squinting. Integrated Power generated cash, the LNG portfolio captured a wider arbitrage than the prompt suggested, and Refining & Chemicals held up despite a soft European margin environment.

Net debt to capital employed of 11.3%, organic free cash flow of $5.1bn, and a continued $2bn-per-quarter buyback alongside the $0.85 dividend means the shareholder return policy now consumes almost exactly 100% of distributable cash at $75 Brent. That is a tighter cushion than at Shell, and it is the line I would watch into Q3 if the macro slips.

One quiet flag: working capital absorbed $1.7bn in the quarter, partly seasonal but partly reflecting an inventory build in the trading book. Trading P&L was strong enough that no one is going to complain, but it is the sort of number that, four quarters in a row, stops looking seasonal.

SAP Q1 2026: the cloud transition is finished — now the business has to actually grow

Cloud revenue +27% in constant currency, current cloud backlog of €18.1bn, and an operating margin re-rating that has done most of the work in the share price for two years. The next leg is harder.

The transition narrative was an extraordinary one to trade: predictable revenue mix shift, multiple expansion as the market gave the company SaaS comparables, and a credible restructuring story. All of that is now in the price. From here, SAP has to re-accelerate organic cloud growth from the high-20s into the 30s, or the multiple compresses.

I am not sure the Q1 print supports the higher growth thesis. The current cloud backlog growth rate decelerated to 28% from 31% the prior quarter on a sequential basis — modest, but a deceleration nonetheless — and the Business AI revenue contribution remains disclosed only qualitatively, which after four quarters of build-up is starting to feel like a tell.

Free cash flow of €3.6bn (vs €2.9bn prior year) is genuinely impressive and underwrites the €5bn buyback commitment without any balance sheet strain. As a cash story, this is a fine print. As a growth story, the next two quarters need to do more.

Stay in touch

New notes go out by email each Wednesday morning, before the European open. No paywall, no upsell — just the writing.

Or write directly: julien@financialstatementanalysis.example